Reddit and powergame.gr are actual results from the Greek quick-service study. Other sources are shown by type with illustrative values.
Everyone measures how visible you are in AI answers. Nobody measures how easily you disappear. Optimus shows you where that happens — and how to fix it, so your brand stays in the answer.
Every GEO tool counts mentions, citations and share of voice. None of them can tell you which sources actually hold your visibility up. Optimus maps that network — and shows you which single source, if lost, takes you out of the answer.
The most-cited source is not the one holding you up.
We ran Optimus on the Greek quick-service restaurant market — Goody's, Everest, Burger King, Simply and their competitors — across ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude and Perplexity. Ranked by how often they are cited and by how much they actually determine the answer, the same sources tell two different stories.
Second most-cited source in the market
Cited four times in the whole study
Three answers no dashboard gives you.
Which sources carry your visibility
Ranked by the role they play in connecting the questions your buyers ask to your brand — not by how often they show up.
How many you can afford to lose
A hard number: the smallest set of sources whose loss removes you from AI answers. If it's one, you have a single point of failure.
What to fix first, per euro
A ranked intervention plan — owned content, placements, corrections — chosen for the largest expected gain within your budget.
Available now.
Structural visibility audit
Your market, your prompts, the four major engines. You get the sources you depend on, the ones you can't afford to lose, and the first interventions worth funding.
Crisis and narrative targeting
Where a claim about you entered the network, which pages are copies of that one origin, and the smallest set of corrections that changes what AI says.
Due diligence
Whether a target's AI visibility is robust or resting on one or two sources it doesn't control.